1. Want to get our most recent announcements - and XP codes - in your email?

    Sign up for our brand new mailing list!

Comments on Profile Post by HBDayRichRamp

  1. notswipe
    notswipe
    Wow. Here's the thing. You said that Galap is a coding "doggo."
    Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.
    As someone who is a scientist who studies puppers, doggos, yappers, and even woofers, I am telling you, specifically, in doggology, no one calls puppers doggos. If you want to be specific, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.
    May 3, 2017
  2. notswipe
    notswipe
    If you're saying "doggo family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of Doggodaemous, which includes things from sub woofers to birdos to sharkos (the glub glub kind not the bork bork kind).
    So your reasoning for calling a pupper a doggo is because random people "call the small yip yip ones doggos?" Let's get penguos and turkos in there, then, too.
    Also, calling someone a human or an ape?
    May 3, 2017
  3. notswipe
    notswipe
    It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A pupper is a pupper and a member of the doggo family. But that's not what you said. You assumed Galap was a doggo, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the doggo family doggos, which means you'd call piggos, sluggos, and other species doggos, too. Next time, watch your mouth, kiddo.
    May 3, 2017
  4. HBDayRichRamp
    HBDayRichRamp
    End me
    May 3, 2017
  5. Galap
    Galap
    Thanks for the lesson in Doggology, it was very interesting, NotSwipe! However, I must confess that I am actually a Galapagos Tortoise, so a torto. Regardless, thank you for the insight!
    May 3, 2017
  6. notswipe
    notswipe
    Wow. Here's the thing. You said that you are a "torto." Is it [REDACTED BY 323]
    May 8, 2017